The Hyde Amendment challenges vexatious, frivolous bad faith prosecutions like the Yellow House Case

Get free hit counter code here.

It is illegal for a Federal U.S. Attorney to take on a Frivolous case for prosecution. Because of the power invested to the Government to control every aspect of a persons life during prosecution on a Federal level, it is both unethical and unlawful for cases that lack viable evidence to be prosecuted on a Federal level.


Yellow House secondhand store Investigation and prosecution Vexatious, frivolous and in bad faith.
The Yellow House Secondhand store case clearly displays prosecutorial abuse in the United States Attorney office.
It shows the lack of oversight in the practices of ethics, in the police department, the press and the courts.
The prosecutors in this case clearly failed to screen the facts for sufficient evidence or the nature of the severity of the crime. Clearly this frivolous case has been persued in bad faith by the Prosecution.

At some point the transcripts from the Grand Jury indictment hearing should be made available because the public will be entitiled to know about the level of perjury and unreliable coerced testimony that was presented to the Grand Jury by convicted unreliable felons through misdirected and overzealous prosecutors.

According to the Hyde Amendment, it is no longer possible for U.S. Attorney's to prosecute Frivolous cases without accountability.

The purpose of this amendment is to take time and resources from the Justice department. Hopefully they will think twice about bringing cases for which there is no substantial justification like in the Yellow House case.

If someone is a prosecutor and they are going to wrench somebody out of their business, home, and status in society and put them on trial as a criminal, there ought to be enough in the case that it is substantially justified to prosecute these people at a Federal level.

The Prosecution should not be able to rely solely on unsubstantiated circumstancial evidence, that was coerced through perjured testimony before a Judge and Grand Jury, illegal searches, intimidation, fabricated evidence and violations in the chain of evidence rules.

The opinion of society is they do not want the Government to waste their resources on cases that are not substantially justified, but what about the citizen who has been put through the hoops? What is the remedy, if not this, for someone who has been unjustly, maliciously, improperly, abusively tried by the Government, by faceless bureaucrats who hire a law firm or get a U.S. Attorney looking for an easy mark?