Sunday, March 29, 2009

AGENTS SEEN AT THE WICHITA DOJ

At 10:30 March 24Th, 2008, Guy and Carrie were in Judge Murguia's Court in the Kansas City DOJ. Addressed during the hearing were the conflict of interest issues between Guys attorney Dione Sheriff and Carries attorney Phil Gibson. Marietta Parker and Terra Morehead were not present during the hearing. Scott Rask was the Prosecutor that attended that hearing.

Backing up the confidential informants information, during an arraignment hearing before Judge Murguia on Wednesday the week before, Marietta Parker had stated in court she had some business in Wichita and would not be attending the March 24th hearing.

The Wichita office of the DOJ is the office that filed the Illegal Lis Pendens against the Neighbors Property. It was filed by AUSA Annette Gurney.

On March 26Th, 2008, the Neighbors were told "confidentially" that Agents were seen in the Wichita Department of Justice. Something was going on at the DOJ. An Agent was standing guard at the front door and only employees with Identification were being allowed in. Parker was seen several times stepping outside the building to smoke cigarettes that day. It appeared that she was being accompanied by perhaps a female agent. Parker and the Female agent appeared to have arrived at the DOJ together in what appeared to be a Government car. It also appeared that a number of Agents were seen carrying out boxes on dollies of what appeared to be some kind of files.
On March 27th, two people that appeared to be employees of the Wichita DOJ were seen leaving the building in an official capacity with several agents in an official car, perhaps taken to another location for questioning? One of the people leaving with the Agents matched the description of Annette Gurney, however that was not confirmed.

Wednesday, March 25, 2009

Missing evidence creates serious consequences in criminal cases.
When evidence is discovered missing from a Police department evidence locker, protocol would be for a prompt investigation by an outside agency such as the FBI. To avoid the appearance of cover-up and corruption, and to protect the Constitutional rights of the accused, one might expect an investigation would take place to find out the validity of the complaint before a Prosecutor would pursue an indictment in a case connected to the missing evidence, and chain of custody violations.

Yet in August of 2006, After the Yellow House Store owners Guy and Carrie Neighbors were told by Lawrence Kansas Police officer Jay Bialek they could have several expensive laptops back that had been improperly seized during the December 2005 execution of a search warrant. Officers then admitted they could not find the laptops in the evidence locker.

In response to the missing evidence the Neighbors filed numerous complaints to the police departments Internal Affairs Sargent Dan Ward, addressing the missing evidence, search warrant issues and chain of custody violations.

CONSPIRACY:
These Formal complaints to the Lawrence Kansas Police Departments Internal Affairs were forwarded to AUSA Marietta Parker, Federal Prosecutor Terra Morehead then filed a frivolous Federal Indictment against both the Neighbors, accusing them of being "unlawful users with firearms" in a hurried effort to cover-up the complaints and interfere with any possible pending investigations into the missing evidence.. Even though the chain of custody violations, search warrant issues and missing evidence, can destroy the prosecutors chances of a future conviction in the case.

FROM 2005-2009 (PRESENT)
The Federal Prosecutors, and Police officers in this case have continued to conspire and cover-up, for missing evidence, and police corruption, by having the Neighbors repeatedly Indicted, arrested, incarcerated, selectively prosecuted, subjected to warrantless searches, subjected to repeated sting operations, and denied due process of law.

1.2006 Federal Indictment for "Unlawful user with firearms,(Absent of any criminal history,..this case was dropped by the prosecutor, then refiled one month later as a new case, the refiled charges included a strong armed arrest of the Neighbors in their home by the Postal Inspector & IRS Agent, 8 hours of detention shackled in a cold cell without food, a false press release by the Prosecutor stating they were indicted for drug distribution. And an illegal warrantless search of their entire home. The second indictment including the gun charge was dropped the second time by Federal Judge John Lungstrum for speedy trial violations) Manufacturing Marijuana was added to the second Indictment and that charge was left standing. Even though the Police began searching the home at 9am December 3, 2005, but did not get the search warrant signed by Judge Six until 1:30 that day.

2. The Neighbors then filed a Formal Complaint to Internal Affairs Sargent Dan Ward that Lawrence Police officers Micky Rantz and Jay Bialek were posing as FBI agents, to intimidate witnesses and cover-up for the fact no FBI was involved in the Investigation the Federal Prosecutors were conducting against the Neighbors business. The Formal complaint was forwarded to AUSA Marietta Parker who then sent down FBI agent Walter Schaefer from the Kansas City FBI who used the fake name "Bob Shaefer" to stage a fake FBI investigation into the Neighbors complaints and cover-up for the police misconduct. The FBI Agent announced to the media that the Lawrence Police had been cleared and the same day to retaliate the Federal Prosecutor had the Lawrence Police, Postal Inspector and IRS execute two more search warrants on the Neighbors business and home.

3. In 2007 An LJWorld reporter Ron Knox and the Neighbors were all told by the Kansas City FBI, the FBI investigation into the police misconduct complaints by the Neighbors never took place. The Kansas city FBI also stated they had no jurisdiction to do investigations in Lawrence Kansas. The Neighbors were told by the Kansas City FBI to contact the Topeka FBI. The Neighbors met with the Topeka FBI agents Scott Gentine and Denton Murray and gave them copies of the formal complaints connected to the missing evidence and police misconduct. The following week Dave Bryant also filed a complaint with Topeka FBI agent Scott Gentine because his guns that had been stolen during a burglary, and later recovered in a drug bust were also missing from the Lawrence Kansas Police Department evidence locker, and he had found them being offered for sale in the 23rd street Pawn Shop.

4. In an effort to cover-up for the fact the Neighbors had found out about the fake FBI investigation, the following week the Prosecutor Marietta Parker filed a 19 count Federal Indictment against the Neighbors for "money laundering and Ebay fraud". And made the public false written statement the case had been investigated by the FBI.

5. To further the conspiracy, in August of 2008, the Federal Prosecutor Terra Morehead had the Neighbors arrested on Federal charges by the Postal Inspector David Nitz, for "Federal Obstruction of Justice"

(The Federal Obstruction charge was based on the fact the Neighbors requested KU Detective Mike Riner take the Laptop and copy the information about the seller, but allow them to have their attorneys handle turning over the original sellers form on Monday).

This was a State Investigation by the University Police into a laptop stolen by Robert Sample from KU, that had been sold to the business. Even though the business owners had cooperated with the investigation, a search warrant was served on the business during which the police stole the businesses surveillance tape and replaced it with a blank tape. The Neighbors were taken into Federal custody August 8Th, and incarcerated for four days in the Douglas County Jail, Aug. 11th they were transferred by the Postal Inspector David Nitz from the Douglas County Jail to the Kansas DOJ for an initial appearance, from there the Neighbors were transferred to the Leavenworth Maximum Security Federal Detention Center and imprisoned until Aug. 18th. They were released and on the 19th of August Terra Morehead Indicted the Neighbors for Federal "Obstruction of Justice". On March 10th in connection to the same case, Robert Sample plead guilty to misdemeanor theft in State Court.

Sunday, March 22, 2009

Freindship Conspiracy on Facebook

WTF???

What is a defendant to think?

Why would an attorney of a former client who is no longer on a case, and was forced to withdraw from the case because of a conflict of interest send a "friend request" for Face Book to that former client while the clients criminal case is still pending in Federal Court?

How much money would the Federal Prosecutor offer a former attorney to try and get into the facebooks of the defendants and their current attorney to find out......?



Everything in this case points to conspiracy, or is there some other explaination?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Facebook
To: Carrie Jackson Neighbors
Subject: Phil Gibson added you as a friend on Facebook...
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 14:57:01 -0700



Phil added you as a friend on Facebook. We need to confirm that you know Phil in order for you to be friends on Facebook.

To confirm this friend request, follow the link below:
http://www.facebook.com/n/?reqs.php&mid=2776dbG240183dfG1565a5dG2

Thanks,
The Facebook Team

Dan Talked to Annette. It was a disaster 3-20-2009

John,
We convinced Annette Miller to talk to Dan about the harassment she received
from the LPD, The only reason Annette agreed to talk to Dan was because Dan
worked for you and for some reason they trust you and not so much Cheryl.
During the conversation she had with Dan Dan suggested that Annette have her
attorney contact Cheryl. Annette was freaked out because she knew Dan worked
for you and she could not understand why Dan would ask her to have her
people contact Cheryl. Now as you can see from Annette's email she sent to
me she is having seconds thoughts about talking to Dan again.
We thought it would be great to have a statement from Annette about what the
cops have done to her.
Annette's said her case was sealed because the police had been harassing her
and after she moved to Colorado, they slashed her tires, they called DPS
twice a month to tell them that she was abusing her kids, that she was doing
drugs, buying crack, has unsafe enviorment for her kids,ect...
Anette filed a formal complaint with the LPD and that should be some proof
of the beginning of her journey.

Annette talked to Dan on Fri. night and it was late so they chatted for a
little while and Dan was going to return a call to her on sat. but did not.
Annette called me to tell me she was freaked out that Dan wanted her to call
Cheryl and not you so I sent Dan a email informing him that Annette did not
trust Cheryl and I do not trust her much either (because of certain things
not important for this letter). I wanted Dan to know how Annette felt so he
would not chase her off.

Annette sent me a email stating she will not speak to anyone now until we
figure out why Dan would want her to have her people call Cheryl instead of
you.
I also wanted dan to be aware Annette Can NOT discuss her civil case.
Below is the email Annette sent me about the conversation she had with Dan,
and below that is the email I sent to Dan after Dan and Annette had there
chat.
Also in my email is some information about events going on in CCA, just
wanted you to be aware
Thanks
Hope your having a good day
Guy.
kissme_please@yahoo.com is annette's email address

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: annette basurto
Date: Mar 21, 2009 5:08pm
Subject: Re: Talking to Annette & informtion about whats going on in CCA
To: Guy Neighbors


>
> I talked to dan and he asked me about the police harrassing me about the
car. he also asked me for names of the officers that came into the kwik
shop when i worked there. then he told me it would be a good idea if i
would have my attorney contact cheryl. this bothered me being i was under
the impression that he worked for jon and not cheryl. i would appreciate if
you would find out for me what is going on before i talk to anyone again
about anything thanks
> --- On Sat, 3/21/09, Guy Neighbors guyn50@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> From: Guy Neighbors guyn50@gmail.com>
> Subject: Talking to Annette & informtion about whats going on in CCA
> To: powrsleuth@aol.com, kisme_please@yahoo.com
> Date: Saturday, March 21, 2009, 2:35 AM
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi, Dan
>
>
> Hey Annette said she called you and chatted for a little while.
>
>
> I was puzzled that you suggested she have her attorney talk with Cheryl
when your the investigator for John.
>
>
> I'm just going to let you know how we feel and we just do not trust Cheryl
much at this point, the only reason Annette agreed to talk with you was
because you work for John Duma.
>
>
> Annette had been through the ringer with this shit she's been through and
you would not believe the crap that has happened in the government effort to
discredit her and to jam up her attorneys so the city will not have to pay
her. I know Cheryl told you guys that Annette's crazy just like the
government was saying about me. We do not want to take any chances on having
Annette's attorney getting in any kind of trouble, the judge has gaged them
anyway from discussing the case. All we need from Annette is to discuss the
harassment she received from the LPD, you know Annette filed a formal
complaint with the police dept. and that should show a starting point for
her journey. Annette is NOT willing to discuss her civil action only what
the police done to her, she will not talk to Cheryl only you because they
like John and we trust you, if you pressure her to talk to Cheryl she will
not feel safe talking to you.
>
>
> I don't think talking to her i should be such a big deal because i know
you have chatted with a bunch of people who said the police are full of
shit, I would be willing to bet that you have not found one single person
who had anything bad to say about the yellow house.
>
>
>
>
>
> Hey and a different note I was contacted today by a guy who said he was
waiting for something to arrive in the mail from a guy in CCA, he said that
his friend told him to get it to me and he said something about
Moorehead made this guy lie in court for her and then she screw him and
refused to follow up on her part of the deal she made with him. I do not
know what it is coming but I cant wait to get it. The word is there are 3
black guy's in CCA the guards have been fucking with that know me and now
the guards have been leaving them alone " I think they are talking about the
Williams brothers and McIntyre" anyway the word is there sentencing hearing
got postponed and the inmates think that my blog site may have had something
to do with there case getting put on ice, can you imagine that? The word is
also Moorehead had been running around trying to cover her ass and trying to
clean up her dirty tracks she has left
>
> behind. I told him to tell his friend we have real investigator looking at
our case and other dirty shit going on and they would love to talk to
people at CCA that have been case jumping for Moorehead, I told this guy
that all I need is a name and a prison ID number and my people would love to
talk to them about Mooreheads crap.
>
>
>
>
>
> Also someone has been spreading the word in CCA that I'm mentally ill,
how funny s that.
>
>
> No one understands what I have been doing, everybody keeps telling me I do
not have a chance of fighting the federal government because they got too
much money and they play dirty and to those people I just say my goal is not
to win but to make them submit, yep give up toss in the towel and that's why
I have been such a pain in the ass. The only problem is I may need to be
placed in the witness protection program when the case is done because of
all of the people who will be looking at issues for screwing up up, lol

Friday, March 13, 2009

John,

I just wanted to let you know that Annette talked to her attorney today. She said he was pretty mad about Dan suggesting she have her attorney contact Cheryl. (I am not going to repeat what she said he said about that...:(. He told her that for him to be contacting anybody involved in our case to discuss her case, without her present would be an ethical violation.

I am confused as to why my investigator working for my attorney, talking to my witnesses, would even suggest or recommend that the witnesses contact someone else's attorney. Cheryl is not working my case you are. I have to fully trust you, and fully trust that you are 100% involved and informed while making the decisions you must make. This makes me wonder if other witnesses have been steered away from my attorney. Its a trust issue.

I am the one most at jeopardy in this case. Because I am the one everyone is getting the deal to lie about!
And I am the one that ran the Lawrence store and wrote all the checks to pay people for their items that were brought into the store. Guy was always in Topeka. He never even met any of the people they are using against me. I kept the checks from his Topeka store account in the Lawrence store and bought most of the stuff he was selling in the Topeka store at the Lawrence store.

It was very difficult for Annette to make the decision to come forward, because of the corruption and abuse that she has gone through. She has been very scared. Mike did not trust Cheryl, but for some reason felt he could trust you and Dan to talk to his client. He felt it would be okay to let his guard down just a little and let her come down to give a statement. But he didn't want anybody to know they were coming. She said Mike didn't want us to tell anybody, including Dan or our attorneys. We agreed. You can imagine the "shock" when his Law firm was served the papers on Friday by the Prosecutor letting him know they knew he was coming.

He and Annette were just outside of Topeka about 3:30 when his Law firm called him and said that the firm had just been served by the Prosecutor in Kansas threatening ethics violations against Mike for crossing State lines representing a client.


John,
As far as Cheryl goes. I am just glad she is not representing me. She never answers Guys emails, she refuses to address or answer his concerns, she wont take his phone calls. She refused to give him a copy of his evaluation that Marilynn did, (he has not even seen it) she has not provided him with anything from the courts, you sent me a letter letting me know when our hearing was canceled. Cheryl did not notify Guy at all. After repeated phone calls and emails to her office, instead of returning Guys call personally she had her legal aid person call Guy and inform him that she would not be providing him a copy of his evaluation, because she does things differently than John Duma does.
When Phil Gibson sent the request to be Friends on Facebook, Guy sent Cheryl an email letting her know that he wanted her to tell Phil to leave him alone. She actually answered that email and defended Phil. She said that Phil had sent a request to her too. Personally I see that as even more inappropriate. Why would Phil want to get into all the facebooks of everyone involved in our case? If I was an attorney I would not think it appropriate to request to get into former clients and their current attorneys facebooks, while they are still under indictment. (Facebook is networking among friends, so if you can get into one persons facebook with mutual friends you can see whats being discussed.)


But maybe I just expect too much out of people. Then again they sure don't mind expecting a lot out of me!

Thursday, March 12, 2009

March 10th Robert Sample arrested on misdemeanor theft. Serving jail time from March 10-April 8

-------------------------

Interesting, it seems as if his cooperation with the government didn't do him as much good as he thought.
John.