Prosecutor Marietta Parker Edits Blogspot post in cover-up conspiracy, obstruction of justice

Prosecutor Marietta Parker uses password obtained through warrant to edit and delete posts from defendant Guy Neighbors blog site!
To understand why and what has happened here in the present we must first go back to the past.

During an evidence hearing November 5, 2007 before the Honorable Judge Lungstrum; U.S. Attorney Terra Morehead explains to the Judge that the reason the defendants Guy and Carrie Neighbors were denied their legal right to a speedy trial was because there was a tornado in Greensburg Kansas.....

Later while talking to some long time friends the Neighbors mentioned they did not understand why the tornado in Greensburg Kansas would be the reason the Prosecutor told the Judge they were denied the speedy trial.
The Neighbors were informed by this friend that Terra was from Greensburg and that they had gone to school with Terra Morehead. They also knew Terra's family and informed the Neighbors that they believed Terra and her brother had a history of drug abuse and that from what they knew the family had been torn apart by drugs. They questioned how someone with a drug history had become a Federal Prosecutor.

Mr. Neighbors then posted a story with this acquired information on his blog site. He felt the information could be connected to the discriminatory abusive treatment he and his wife had received, while being prosecuted in Federal court by Terra Morehead. He also believed this history of drug abuse in Ms. Moreheads family combined by her hatred towards people of color, could be what is driving the prosecutor to abuse his civil rights and show obvious signs that she and her partner US Assistant Attorney Marietta Parker are taking the case personal.

This posting greatly upset the Prosecutors.
In response to the posting, Prosecuting Attorney Terra Morehead immediately motioned to have the defendants Gagged. During the hearing the Prosecutor Terra Morehead had an emotional breakdown, she cried and pleaded with Judge to gag the defendants, and make them stop blogging. She stated that a photo taken from the “Scruffy the dog case internet story” had been placed on the defendants blog site, and that she had received threats because this photo which was already publicly displayed on the internet had been posted on the blog site. She told the Judge that because of the blogs her cases were being investigated 5 years back by an outside agency!

The day of the hearing for the gag order, Mr. Neighbors is informed through an anonomous email through the blog account, that a co-worker of Marietta Parker overheard her in her office preparing for the hearing; slamming things and yelling the "N" word! Mr. Neighbors again angered the prosecutor by posting this aquired information on his blog site.

Sometime around May 2008 Prosecuting US Federal Attorney Marietta Parker serves a warrant on Sunflower cable to obtain the password information connected to the defendants Internet activities. She then logs into the defendants blog account and proceeds to go to the edit tools and deletes the story Mr. Neighbors had written about Terra Moreheads past drug history. There is also evidence through her actions that she was also logging into the email accounts and possibly reading attorney client correspondence emails.

To cover up for the fact she has illegally edited Mr. Neighbors blog account, Federal Prosecutor Marietta Parker then files a motion to revoke the bonds of the defendants Mr. Neighbors and his wife based on the blogs.

To support her motion to revoke the bond she uses pages from the blogs as exhibits. These exhibits clearly show when she copied and printed them off, she was not only logged into Mr. Neighbors blog account, she had also used the editing tools before printing off the pages. (The editing tools can still be seen in the exhibits. See photo at top of page)

What possible probable cause would give a Federal Prosecuting attorney the right to serve a search warrant on a defendants Internet provider in order to obtain passwords to everything in relation to that defendants Internet IP address?

Thus allowing this prosecutor to tamper with "the evidence" which is in this case constitutionally protected freedom of speech postings on a private blog site and view private emails that contain attorney client correspondence? How many constitutionally protected rights can a defendant have violated while being corruptly prosecuted?

IN CONCLUSION;
What justifiable legal basis or probable cause reason could a prosecutor possibly have; to get a warrant for passwords that enables her to be editing and eavesdropping on a defendants emails and blogging pages in relation to trumped up Federal charges based the execution of an illegal warrantless search of the defendants home and a bogus stolen property, money laundering case that hinges on the perjured testimony of convicted felons?

The actions of these prosecutors clearly show cover-up, conspiracy, tampering with the evidence, obstruction of justice, misuse of private information obtained through a search warrant, violation of privacy and a violation of Attorney rules of ethics.

MARIETTA PARKER USES 4 TIME CONVICTED FELON PATRICK NIEDER IN YELLOW HOUSE CASE

Double standard funny how it goes, federal prosecutor Marietta Parker filed a motion to have my bond revoked because I made a phone call to Lawrence police officer Mike McAtee to ask him "how many drug test he had failed?" ( I had heard he has failed quite a few).

Marietta Parker told the judge that I had contact with a government witness because of the phone call when officer McAtee is not even on the yellow house case, and his name is not on any of my paper work relating to the case.

The government’s star witness Patrick Nieder (a convicted felon & prisoner at Winfield Correctional facility) that lied before the grand jury ( to help Parker get the 2nd indictment against me, in exchange for being released from prison 8 years early) has sent his girl friend into our business to sell us items because they are in need of money! Her name is Terri Mcdowell.

Terri sold me a refrigerator and I went to their house to pick up the refrigerator on Fri. June 20th and Patrick Nieder was hiding out inside the house. After loading up the refrigerator Terri told me she had other stuff in her garage she was looking to sell, one of the items was a real nice John Deere lawn tractor-mower.

Terri told me that her honey got the mower for her and she was not sure where it came from... so I told her that I would need to think about it (not knowing that Nieder was hiding out in this house at 2802 belle haven Dr. Lawrence)

I thought it was kind of weird that she would not know where the real nice John Deere riding mower came from.......

The next day one of my friends came into my business to tell me that he had seen me at Patrick Nieder’s house loading up a refrigerator, and of course I replied “what the hell are you talking about?” my friend explained to me that Terri was in fact dating Patrick and my friend knew that Nieder had lied to the grand jury to help the federal prosecutor get an indictment against my wife and myself with lies.

The following Monday I received 2 phone calls from 1-785-424-3004 so I returned one of the calls and got Mr. Nieders voice mail.

Later that day Mr. Nieder had his girl friend call me about purchasing the stolen John Deere lawn tractor for $700. Could this contact violate the court order of not having contact with a witness in a federal case?

The prosecutor is trying to have me locked up for having contact with a police officer not involved in the case, but this guy is free to do what he wants!

Maybe the federal prosecutor Marietta Parker is paying mr. Nieder to get and get him to sell the yellow house stolen property so she can send the Lawrence police back to our business and home to make another arrest and illegally search our home again?

It had been about a year now and in order for the prosecutor to keep this thing going without the evidence needed to get a conviction she needs to have us arrested about every 9-12 months and come up with more ridiculous charges.


My people told me the Lawrence police was at 2802 bellehaven on Thur. of that week searching for a meth lab 10 police cars and the meth lab van, and not one cop ran a check on the stolen John Deere riding mower in the garage? Nor did they confiscate it...

Interesting double standard between how the white guy and the black guy are treated!

Prosecutor Federal U.S. Attorney Terra Morehead controls attorneys with corrupt contract

HOW THE FEDERAL PROSECUTOR TERRA MOREHEAD CORRUPTLY CONTROLS THE DEFENSE ATTORNEYS

In reaction to a Prosecutor withholding discovery from a defendant the Judge writes:
This is prosecutorial misconduct in its highest form; conduct in flagrant disregard of the United States Constitution; and conduct which should be deterred by the strongest sanction available," wrote Judge Kim Wardlaw.

Here is a copy we have obtained of the contract that (AUSA) U.S. Assistant Prosecuting attorney Terra Morehead makes the Defense attorneys sign, before allowing them to be appointed to cases she is prosecuting in Federal Court.

(According to this contract) If they do not agree with this contract then they must not take the case.

It would appear this contract allows the prosecutor to weed out the attorneys that would honestly defend a client.... and keep attorneys on the opposing case that allows her to maintain control of the case and guarantee a conviction!

Perhaps by not only controlling how the defense attorney handles the case but also denying the defendant his constitutional right to see the evidence against him.

It also prevents the defendant from having the chance to point out the discrepancies in the evidence that could be associated with the case prior to trial.


Leaving the defendant with no idea what the corrupt evidence the prosecutor plans to use, until at trial when it is too late to prove the evidence is false!

In our case we have seen some of the discovery and it is full of forged documents, false police reports, planted evidence, perjury testimonies, convicted felons listed as witnesses, edited videos and more.

No wonder with all this corruption that is being used to send people to prison, one could know why the prosecutor would not want the defendant to see the discovery being used against them!

Defendants back in Federal court on June 23, 2008

Once again back to court on Monday June 23rd, 2008.

Its pretty amazing to be a defendant planning to go to trial in Federal Court, and expect a jury and Judge to take the case seriously!

With charges based on a messed up violated search warrant, when half the evidence in the case is missing from the police property room, that a police officer obviously has planted evidence, the star witnesses are convicted felons striking a deal, and the documentation shows the Government keeps changing the evidence files!

And lets not forget that half the charges were already thrown out by a Federal Judge because the prosecutor violated the defendants right to a speedy trial the first time around.
After she drops the charges and then she refiled the same charges again.

This time the defendants go before Federal Judge Carlos Murguia to hear his ruling on the motion to continue the July 7 trial setting.

This ridiculous case is a travesty to the entire justice system, a case according to the Prosecutor of the case; U.S. Attorney Terra Morehead quote "this case is on the verge of the ridiculous your honor"! Has it passed the verge yet?

IS POSTING INFORMATION ABOUT THE YELLOW HOUSE CASE GOING TO HURT THE DEFENSE?

Considering since 2005 the YH has been served with over 20 search warrants, by a bunch of cops and people that owed the higher ups a favor, trying desperately to retaliate and find something to prosecute the yellow house owners for!

Considering the sheer number of searches and seizures involved in this case, shouldn't the Government already know everything?

What could possibly be put on this forum that they do not already know after 3 years of investigations that has included months of covert surveillance, multiple sting operations, the seizure of business records and audits going 5 years back.

The Lawrence police called in the IRS to audit the banking records, paypal records, ebay records, business records and tax payments, They called in the Postal service to investigate the shipping records, they called in the fake FBI from Kansas City to investigate and cover up the formal complaints, they called in Federal Prosecutors to help them railroad the defendants and cover up the misconduct in the police department, the Lawrence cops have harassed, bullied and offered money to friends and customers of the Yellow House trying to get them to participate in sting operations against the business. The Prosecutors have even managed to manipulate several defense attorneys working the case.

So I ask you, if all this has not resulted in the Yellow House owners going to jail, being gagged, or having the business shut down...How could words posted on this forum hurt the case?

It seems to me what makes or breaks A case should be the actual evidence, not after the fact constitutionally protected free speech postings.

The question is when all this 3 year long investigation into the Yellow house business results in no convictions and reveals no evidence of a crime, then do you think the Formal complaints that have been turned into Internal Affairs by the Yellow House and their customers, addressing police misconduct, missing evidence, racial profiling, harassment, false arrest, falsified documents, obstruction of justice, FBI impersonations, illegal searches and Constitutional rights violations will be finally investigated with the same diligence?

Public comments to the Yellow House Postings

Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 2:28 pm
Posts: 1929 lawrence_guy wrote:

Yellow House,

I'm not sure who's advising you about posting in this forum, but I can't possibly imagine it would in any way, shape or form help your case. Your posts here don't particularly endear you to the public and seem to lack focus or intent.

While its expected that certain users here would degenerate the conversation into mindless babble, few (if any) are staring down losing their possessions and spending time in prison. From several of your comments here, its bizarre that you would continue to engage in this type of conversation and that you haven't been counseled to stop. Do your lawyers know that you continue to post aggressive, anti-establishment messages on this forum? Wanting to protect your family and yourself is one thing, but these actions seem self-destructive and wholly out of touch with your best interests.

So again, while I nor anyone here should second-guess sage advice from your attorneys, it seems to defy logic that you'd make an aggressive case in a (internet) forum that seems less functional, and more adversarial. If I were under the gun and was facing down both the end of my livelihood and spending time in a federal prison, I don't think I'd be acting so caviler and juvenile about it.

In pursuing your case and its various actions over the years, it would suggest that your actions on Larryville have no effect. Its probably time to grow up and treat this case with the seriousness it deserves, and forget the thought that posting these messages online will somehow benefit you.

Just being honest.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Patricia Post subject: Yellow house
Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 11:56 am


I certainly understand your opinion and reaction to yh's posting history, but i have found some of the posts and responses to reveal more than yh's side. Points have been made that reveal aspects of our local judicial culture that is more important than my or your feelings about yh (which are different), Its made me pay more attention to how our police interact and communicate with the community. They have become more and more insulated, the police, led by olin, are choosing which laws they enforce with very little interaction and exchange with the broader community feelings and priorities. Once a culture closes in on it self, rejecting feed back and exchange of ideas or criticism their vision becomes narrower and narrower. When I was at one meeting and observed how one discussion of how petty theft, robbery was handled. It was stated that there was no need of any discussion about that as the police had different priorities and the public had no idea of how things needed to be done.
I know of two cases that the police seemed biased by the social position of the victims and did not choose to investigate. One one case they made false statement that they did question and investigate. Then when it was proven that the police had not contacted any of the four witnesses, they said that was not how they investigated the case.
Self review of police policies and procedures is not a healthy or effective method. That is basically what we have now. For protection of the police department and the community there should be some sort of citizens review board with real power. While yh does seem to whine the comments that many of their complaints can not be investigated until the police have ended their investigation is alarming. It is like saying one can not remove the fledgling from the cat's mouth unless you can prove the cat has harmed the bird.

_________________
If the truth doesn't save us, what does that say about us?
Lois McMaster Bujold,

REMEBERING MY DAD ON FATHERS DAY

My dad was my hero! I remember as a kid I called him daddy, then as I grew older it was just dad. As a teenager we clashed and I sometimes just did not talk to him at all! But he was always there for me and the tough guy that he was, he would hug me and tell me he loved me every chance he had! And of course whenever it was just the two of us, he let me know "I was his favorite". I later found out my sister was also told she was his favorite!

I am so glad to have had the oportunity to know him as an adult. There was always a part of him I really did not know. That secret inner part of his soul that was a soldier fighting for his country, a purple heart recipient and a rebel. A part of his life he never really wanted to talk about with his children, but was shared by his soldier buddies and my mother.
About the only times he would talk about that part of his life with us kids were the funny stories. Like the time a Babboon tore up the camp! His face always bore the scars from shrapenal of a grenade the enemy threw into a fox hole he and his two best friends were crouched in. Both his friends died that day, and he wore the memory on his face. There were many times during his time overseas he stared death in the face, but somehow God allowed him to come home, and hence his two miracle daughters were born!

When I was growing up I always thought we were rich! Looking back now I know we were actually poor and sometimes my dad was working two jobs just to keep us maintaining our middle class existance. He worked as a police officer for a while. He always wore his uniform and badge with such pride and integrity! He always wanted to help people, and make sure the bad guys were off the street. Then a motorcycle accident while on duty ended his carreer, but he never gave up!

He was always one to stand up and fight for what was right. My dad would never back down when he knew he was right, and neither will I!

No matter what tragedy life threw at my Dad he always seemed to bounce back and his family always came first in his life! He is missed terribly, I am so proud to have had the honor to call this man my "dad"!

MISTAKES BY THE GOVERNMENT PROSECUTOR & POLICE LOWER STANDARD THAN CITIZENS CHARGED WITH A CRIME? YELLOW HOUSE CASE LAWRENCE KANSAS

Get free hit counter code here.

Mistakes: If a citizen makes a mistake or the Government accuses them of a mistake they are put under investigation, arrested, charged and bullied! But where is the standard being held for the Government when they make a mistake?

Was it a mistake that:

The Justice department placed on its web site charges that had been dismissed by a Federal Judge in Federal court 8 months earlier, but were able to get the names of the attorney's that had just been appointed to the case within the past month right?

That the Justice department sends out an erroneous press release stating that that the defendants had two counts of distribution filed against them.

Or that the Justice Department puts out a press release on their own web site claiming the FBI investigated, when in reality the FBI claims to have never even heard about the case!

Or that Sgt. Dan Ward from the Lawrence Kansas Police Department makes the statement in a press release labeling the defendants as the “Largest most sophisticated fencers ever in the history of Lawrence” But A detective from the Lawrence Police Department tells the Yellow House owners that the Pawn shops and 12th Street Bargain Center in Lawrence have more stolen property cases in one month than the Yellow House has had in one year! (Yet neither business was served with 15 search warrants or subjected to the public Government abuse the Yellow House has been subjected to.)

Mistake the prosecutor Terra Morehead refiled the exact same charges with just 7 days left to the speedy trial clock. Made it look like a brand new case, got it in another judges court room and had the defendants formally rearrested instead of allowing them to turn themselves in.

It was a mistake the defendants home was illegally searched by the police and IRS agent Rob Jackson twice during the formal arrest that was a mistake because the defendants could have just been allowed to turn themselves in.

A mistake the Prosecutor placed a lis pendens against the defendants properties and never sent out the required 60 day notice of the filing, or perhaps it was a mistake because it was ruled in the 10th circuit court these types of liens are not allowed prior to a conviction.

A mistake that the Judge Murguia that arraigned the defendants in 2006 is a different Judge Murguia that handles the case in 2007?

A mistake that both defendants have been charged in Federal court by two Prosecutors doing obvious favors for people with charges that the defendants do not qualify for. When the evidence does not support the charges.

A mistake the Prosecutor files a superseding indictment to moot the motion to lift the lis pendends two days after the motion to lift the lis pendens was re-filed? (And the whole matter has never made it before the judge)

A mistake the FBI Special Agent Bob Shaefer came down to investigate the Yellow House complaints but then did not. But claimed he did!

A mistake that the testimony by the witnesses in the case are not only lies, they are ridiculous lies that even a retarded person would question!

IN CONCLUSION:
Shouldn't the public be understandably worried about what such apparent negligence says about the trustworthiness of its lawyers? How can the Government hold ordinary citizens accountable for their alleged unproven mistakes when they themselves make so many mistakes, and disregard the oaths and ethics they are sworn to uphold, then they expect the public to turn the other cheek and ignore? (Because it was just a mistake!)

FEDS AND COPS GONE WILD IN YELLOW HOUSE CASE

COPS SEARCH HOUSE STARTING AT 10AM FOR TRHEE HOURS WITHOUT SEARCH WARRANT....RUN AND GET WARRANT AT 1:30PM....TURN OVER EVIDENCE TO PROSECUTOR...AND TRIAL DATE IS SET FOR JULY 7, 2008!

COPS AND FEDS GONE WILD!


Kansas Department of Justice Federal Prosecutor Terra Morehead plans to take business owners Guy and Carrie Neighbors to trial July 7, 2008 using a home invasion by police with evidence seized absent of a search warrant in 2005!

Police had however obtained a search warrant for the Business property signed by Judge Stephen Six Nov. 30, 2005, and executed Dec. 2, 2005. But did not have a search warrant for the residential property at a different location!

After arriving at the home Dec. 2 at 10 am and searching the home for nearly three hours, the Lawrence Police went before Judge Stephen Six at 1:30 pm that afternoon and allegedly obtained the warrant for the home.. (was it a real warrant or a forged warrant?) (Why would the judge give officers a warrant to search a house they had already been searching for 3 hours?) The police took thousands of dollars worth of valuable collector guns, jewelry, computers, laptops, ipods and other personal belongings from the home not listed on the search warrant for seizure, items not stolen or evidence of any crime, items not individually itemized or documented during the seizure.

HAVE THE FEDS AND POLICE IN KANSAS GONE WILD?

PROOF OF CORRUPTION IN KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, DROPPED CHARGES PUT BACK ON SCHEDULE

Once again the Corrupt Justice Department has intentionally put untrue information out in the public eye! This time on the Justice Departments Judges schedule web site showing false dropped charges!! The charges of "being an unlawful user with firearms" and the gun charges, were dropped nearly 8 months ago November 5, 2007 by the Honorable Judge John Lungstrum.

Is this Justice department so corrupt they don't even know which false charges they are railroading innocent defendants to trial for??

Not only were these charges dropped after a four hour evidence hearing, (an evidence hearing which the prosecutor Terra Morehead failed to present any evidence in) the fact is that these two defendants never qualified to be charged under this statute to begin with! These charges are intended to keep firearms out of the hands of drug users and dealers. To qualify for this charge one must have been charged and convicted of a drug offense within the past 5 years!

Yet here they are again, like some kind of trophy the prosecutor is refusing to relinquish! Another chance to stab that big ol' knife straight into the backs of the defendants and give it a little twist!

It looks like the CORRUPTION IN THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE HAS TRULY COME FULL CIRCLE!

This is so seriously wrong! It shows such a huge lack of integrity, ethics and credability with the people who have been given Governmental power to destroy a defendants life!

THe Federal Prosecutor poem: (by carrie neighbors)
What sin that comes no measure knows
And never change the course
Within the veins corruption flows
Freely from the source.

Lawrence Kansas Corrupt Cop Of The Week II, Was Officer Mike Mcatee This Dirty Cops Partner?

Here is a picture of Brad Perico in our business telling us his story.


Newsbrief: Corrupt Cop of the Week II 2/21/03

This week we have two winners in the Corrupt Cop of the Week Competition. The first winner is the Lawrence, KS, Police Department's star drug cop Officer Stuart "Mike" Peck. Peck was named Officer of the Year last year by a local Veterans of Foreign Wars post and is well-known among local defense attorneys for his role in numerous drug busts in recent years. But he was slapped down last week by Douglas County District Court Judge Michael Malone, who found that Peck lied about informants in order to obtain search warrants in drug cases.

Now Peck has been suspended from duty pending further investigation, and local prosecutors are starting to drop cases in which he was involved. "As far as we're concerned, this officer is not available to testify on criminal cases at this time," District Attorney Christine Kenney told the Lawrence Journal-World on January 28. "More than a dozen" cases will be dismissed, said Kenney, adding that the situation was "unfortunate" and would "cause a lot of hardship" -- presumably for prosecutors, not defendants.Peck's methods aroused the Judge Malone's ire after Peck assured the judge that the credibility of an informant he used in an affidavit to obtain a search warrant was "unquestioned," when the informant actually had a lengthy felony criminal history and was -- gasp -- a known drug user.
Peck's testimony led to the court approving a November 3, 2001 search warrant against local resident James D. Hawkins. On January 24, Judge Malone suppressed the evidence -- including marijuana, cocaine and paraphernalia -- seized from Hawkins' home, saying he had no choice because Peck had lied.

In seeking the 2001 warrant, Peck assured the court that the anonymous informant was "credible" and that his criminal record included only a few "traffic-type things, driving on a suspended license... a lot of domestic-type things. A lot of failure to appears or failure to complies. There was a theft." But Judge Malone later found out that the informant had three drunk-driving convictions, two felony theft convictions, a forgery conviction and a bad check conviction.
Malone also found that Peck had engineered the dismissal of speeding tickets and a domestic violence charge for the informant, and had failed to arrest him when he was found with marijuana during another traffic stop.Defense attorneys were cheered by the ruling. "As chairman of the Douglas County Criminal Defense Bar Association, I can assure you that, as a group, we've been concerned about Officer Peck's work for quite some time," said attorney Jonathan Becker. "But for now, it appears that Officer Peck quite clearly crossed the line. You don't lie in an affidavit that's submitted to the court," Becker said. "That's a very, very big deal"

PS. How can one cop could be fired and almost 40 cases tossed out of court and the dirty cops partner is still on the Lawrence police dept.?
Was officer Mcatee Officer's Peck's partner?

Brad Perico was the informant officer Peck was using (without his partner) and Brad contends that officer Peck was set up by the other officers on the drug task force.
Brad said that Peck was used as a scape goat and that the supervisor knew about the corners the drug tack force were cutting but when the crap hit the fan the blame was tossed over in officers Peck's court to take the blame all alone.
Brad Perico also said that Lawrence police officers Rantz and Jay Bialek wanted him to help them by selling the yellow house stolen property and the cops were going to pay Brad 50.00 to bring stolen property into the yellow house.

Brad interviewed with the Neighbors investigator where he signed a statement stating the cops tried to get him to help them because he had some tickets they could take care of for him in addition to the 50.00.

The officers told Brad that the FBI had him on surveillance from the fire station across the street taking a drill into the yellow house, Brad said that officer Bialek told him they knew he was in trouble and they would take care of the 6 tickets he had if he helped them and they told him that they knew Brad new what was going down in the yellow house.
Brad said he refused to help the cops because the business owners were his friends and the the detective's supervisor Terik Katib hated him and the cops never came through with their part of the deal in the past.
I can not believe these cops would try to use this guy as a informant after the judge jammed up the cops for using him and had all of those cases tossed out of court.

"No single snow flake ever claimed responsiblity for an avalanche!"

When does Government Conspiracy, CORRUPTION, MISCONDUCT NEED INVESTIGATED?

June 2, 2008 was an interesting day in court!

The Neighbors went before Judge Waxse to decide if the bond should be revoked because of the blogs. Outside the court room were 4 officers from the Lawrence Police Department.

Officer Mike McAtee was standing in the hall outside the court room with the other officers. This is the same officer that the prosecutor obsessively has referred to several times in the motion to revoke bond, appearing to cover-up for the allegations against McAtee, even though Mike McAtee has not been an investigator in the Yellow House case that Marietta Parker is prosecuting.

Even though this officer has not been an investigator in the nearly 3 yr. long investigation. Yet it would appear the prosecutor Marietta Parker conspired with fellow colleague attorney Kevin Regan to pose as officer McAtee's civil attorney, then write an intimidation letter to the defendant threatening a law suit.

Then Mr. Regan writes a second retraction e-mail as an obvious favor to Ms. Parker, in which he admits to the Conspiracy and cover-up between him and Marietta Parker because she is a friend and colleague of 20 years.

There appears to be no logical reason for the Government to pay these officers to stand in the hall outside this hearing other than the intimidation factor.

I wonder when do the eyes of the Government get opened to the corruption that is going on here? Just how much evidence has to be presented to show an obvious cover-up and conspiracy? Why has this been allowed to continue for so long? When does the danger of this conspiracy warrant the need for an investigation?

The obvious is that this case with no merit continues to move through the courts not because of the severity of the crime, but rather to continue the cover-up and conspiracy, that has surfaced during the three years it has been pursued by corrupt officials doing obvious favors for one another.
How long can a case of false charges with no evidence, riddled with perjury, misconduct, cover-up, corruption, and conspiracy be allowed to continue to waist the time of the Federal Courts?

Does a defendant have to disappear or die before the danger becomes real?