It appears that very sophisticated techno hackers have managed to hack into the Yellow House stores phone system through Sunflower cable!

What-ever high tech program that is being used is making the Yellow House phone signals so strong that scanners, police radio's and phones in nearby business's are picking up the Yellow House calls.

But it still gets even weirder yet, When someone uses the phone located in the back of the store, conversations at the front desk can be heard through the earpiece, even if the phone at the front desk is hung-up!

There are also strange bubbly noises coming through the line whenever call waiting comes through.

Has anybody else noticed these strange mysterious occurrences in their phones? Perhaps aliens are involved. Or perhaps a highly sophisticated competitor of second hand goods is trying to steal the Yellow House business secrets!

Our phones are bugged.
The transmission of the bug is so strong our neighbors at the liquor store are picking up our telephone calls through their phones. When ever the phone gets a second call from call waiting the phone makes a bubbly noise and for about 3-4 seconds the conversation is cut off. Third we have two cordless phones in the store. One in back and one in front. Several times now while the phone in the front is hung up on the cradle and nothing is even turned on or being used up front, someone has picked up the back room phone and while using it suddenly can hear me talking to customers and rattling papers at the front desk...(that is really freaky!)

This has been going on since August 19th. That day we lost our service for about 1 hour. I called Sunflower and I could tell they knew something was going on because when I told him I was from Yellow House he raised his voice and started to talk nervously.

Why is the proffer report not in the discovery.. My answer is this. The Proffer report was in the discovery when my attorney Phil Gibson had it. But as you know the prosecutor has always controlled my attorneys. Phil gave it back to the Prosecutor to have it changed and he did not get it back. Here is my detailed explaination.

My first two attorneys were threatened with money laundering charges. Bruce Kipps my third attorney told me he was forced by Terra Morehead to sign a contract that made him agree that he could not show me any of the discovery. He was very angry about the contract and told me he did not agree with it. He also said it made defending me very difficult.

But then he said that there was nothing in the contract that prevented me from looking over his shoulder at the discovery when he was looking the other way. "Looking over his shoulder" I saw most of the discovery he had. Including the receipt for same list in his discovery which was written in Micky Rantz hand writing. Bruce was shocked when I showed him my receipt for same list. The first thing he said was "its not even in the same hand writing!". The list has since been changed out by the prosecutor and now all the lists including the one Duma has is in Bialeks handwriting.

Phil Gibson my attorney I had before Duma, did not like Morehead, but told me he totally trusted Parker. He said he and Parker went back a long way. They had worked together in the Western District of Missouri, and he believed she was very honest and trustworthy enough to babysit his grand kids...(That is an exact quote)

He was having a hard time with our case because he was obviously trying to protect Parker. When I discovered the illegal lis Pendens Parker had placed against our property, I asked him to file a motion immediately. He filed a motion and Judge Murguia scheduled us a court date the following week, but Gibson canceled it. After that Gibson stalled repeatedly until Parker had time to file the superseding indictment, with the sole purpose of mooting our lis pendens to keep the issue out of court. Because of the conspiracy with Parker I filed a marsden motion and took it before Judge Murguia, explaining to the Judge that Gibson had a conflict of interest protecting both me and the prosecutor, and therefore I did not feel I could trust him. And the Judge dismissed Gibson as my attorney and hired Duma.

Phil Gibson had my Proffer report in his discovery. Phil was aware my discovery had been tampered with by the prosecutor and even pointed out that Alex McCaulley was only on the case to get information for the prosecutor and to file the motion to stop the speedy trial time before he withdrew. He told me that he would not give the prosecutor my discovery and that when the judge assigned a new attorney to my case that he would hand deliver the discovery to my new attorney....so how could the proffer report be missing now???

THE ANSWER:
I believe that after Phil Gibson questioned me about the proffer report he "freaked out." He told me according to the report he was under the impression Marietta Parker was present during the proffer. I told him absolutely not. I also told him about the recording I played, and he was shocked that there was no mention of that in the report either. I believe Phil gave the report back to Marietta so she could change it, because there were too many discrepancies. But he was taken off the case before he got it back from her, so now its missing from the discovery.

Full docket text for document 158:
MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before District Judge Carlos Murguia: Status Conference as to Guy S. Neighbors, Carrie Neighbors held on 2/18/2009. Terra Morehead and Marietta Parker appeared on behalf of the government. Defendant Guy Neighbors appeared in person and through counsel, Melanie Morgan and Cheryl Pilate. Defendant Carrie Neighbors appeared in person and through counsel, John Duma. Without objection from the parties, the additional time excluded would serve the ends of justice and would outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant's right to a speedy trial under 18 U.S.C. section 3161(h). The court orders that the time period from January 27, 2009 through October 5, 2009 (and later depending on the other cases and their trial settings to be further determined at the next court appearance) shall be excluded under speedy trial calculations. Motions due by 7/27/2009. Response deadline 8/10/2009. Motion Hearing set for 8/18/2009 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 463 (CM) before District Judge Carlos Murguia. Jury Trial set for 10/5/2009 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 463 (CM) before District Judge Carlos Murguia. Hearing exhibit to be filed under seal separately. Defendants to remain on bond. (Court Reporter Nancy Wiss.) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (jw)

During 2008 while Phil Gibson was still defending me, we attended a case hearing at the DOJ. Officer Bialek & Rantz attended the hearing. After the hearing, investigators followed Bialek back to Lawrence.

That afternoon my friend Jennifer told me while she was at work that day she had stepped outside for a smoke. She noticed a girl standing in the parking lot across the way that she recognized as a "skanky stripper" from the Outhouse strip club. A few minutes later she saw a police car pull up to the girl driven by Officer Bialek. The police car stopped and the stripper leaned into the window talking to the officer.

Later another person told us the investigator had followed Bialek that night to a local motel in his cruiser while on duty. He met a girl with a similar description that my friend had seen him earlier that day with. The two went into a room in the motel for about 20 minutes or so. When officer Bialek came out of the motel he noticed the investigator who was video taping him with a pair of digital binoculars. He approached the car and threatened the investigator with an arrest for stalking. All of which was recorded.

The next day the investigator met with US Attorney Marietta Parker in her office. Parker assumed that the investigator was a law enforcement officer involved in the Yellow House case. The meeting had proceeded for appx. 45 minutes when Parkers phone rang. She answered it; and it was Bialek. She put Bialek on speaker phone and proceeded to talk to him. Bialek told Parker that someone had been following him. She informed Bialek that an officer was in her office now meeting with her. He asked her to describe the officer and at that point she turned off the speaker. She finished the call and called security to have the investigator removed from her office.

During the meeting Parker admitted to the investigator that she had taken the Yellow House case even though it was very weak, because she owed someone a favor. She also admitted there was nothing except circumstantial evidence against the Neighbors. When he questioned her about charging people in Federal court on just circumstantial evidence she stated "we are working on that." When he was being escorted out of her office she told the investigator that the conversation was nothing but hearsay. He then let her know the conversation had been recorded.