Lawrence Kansas Police, Detectives, Agents, Da's Involved in Yellow House investigation

Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves. ~Abraham Lincoln

----------------------------------------
Dectives, agents, police officers and DA's are involved in the corrupt Yellow House case and execution of the multiple questionable search warrants, seizures of property, misplaced and undocumented evidence.
Illegally seized private gun collection stored in a locked safe unloaded and seized without a search warrant for the safe. Guns the police did not properly document or photograph.

Jay Bialek
Sgt. Tarik Khatib
Tina Shaumbough
Tony Garcia
Adam Heffley
Scott Slifer
David Axman
Troy Squire
Justin Stipanovich
John Hanson
Rob Jackson
David Nitz
Michael Ramsey
Dean Ohman
Sean Brown
S. Bonham
Juan Ngunyen
Jay Rozell
Lance flacshbarth
S. Verbanic
M. McNamee
Rich Britain

IS THIS POLICE ABUSE? HOW MANY COMPLAINTS DOES IT TAKE TO GET THE POLICE TO RESPECT ONES SAFETY?

The Yellow House parking lot consists of only four stalls and is just a few feet from the front door. It has been established its way too small for officers to safely do traffic stops in.
The owners of Yellow House have turned in formal complaints to Lawrence Kansas Internal affairs sgt. Requesting the Police not make repeated traffic stops in the business parking lot.
Not only is it a danger to the business and the its patrons (Should a traffic stop go bad) It is also not big enough for an officer in trouble to be able to have adequate backup should the need arrive.
The owners of the Yellow House were also told by a Lawrence Kansas Police Detective that the police do go out of their way to stay out of the Pawn shops parking lot with marked cars because quote "it makes the business look bad". They are now set up to do most of the weekly reports through the Internet.
SO WHY is the Yellow House parking lot looking more like a satellite office for LKPD?

Amazing that with all this police activity outside and inside the business, the Prosecutor makes plea deals with people to testify in FEDERAL court that the Yellow House Fences stolen property, and traffics guns and displays drugs openly behind the front counter of the business!

MANIPULATION OF PRESS RELEASE BY LOCAL MEDIA, PLAY ON WORDS BY DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE IN YELLOW HOUSE CASE

UPDATE:
Answers to the questions we asked earlier are revealed in the Kansas Department of Justice's Press release today!
Neither the Lawrence Journal World nor the Topeka Capitol Journal printed the press release in its entirety!

The LJworld left out the fact that Lewis Parsons and James Ludwi's sentencing dates are 7 and 8 months away. Leaving both men hanging until they fulfill the plea agreement they made with the Prosecutor Marietta Parker to lie before the jury during the Yellow House trial in September.

Both news outlets left out the fact that the Neighbors paid 50-80% of the retail value for the items that was purchased from both men. If someone knows something is stolen why on earth would they pay that much for the items?

Obviously the truth is these men were representing the items as legitimate, usually negotiated the price they needed to get from the Yellow House according to what they had paid, there were always witnesses present at the time these transactions took place, all transactions were conducted at the front counter in front of the security video recorder and they accepted business checks for the merchandise.

The interesting play on words here is when the Justice Department attempts to make it look like a BIG CONSPIRACY! WTF?? These two guys did not even know each other!Were never in the store at the same time, and never met each other or Guy Neighbors (the co-owner of the business)! I would really like to know what kind of Conspiracy theory that this Corrupt Prosecutor has cooked up here!

I think the most amusing part of this press release is when Eric Melgren commends everybody for their hard work!
I guess its a lot of hard work to get people to lie in court, cover-up official misconduct, execute illegal searches, steal evidence, switch out evidence reciept for same lists, violate peoples constitutional rights and send out bogus press releases that play on words!

Especially when along with the hard work several of the officers connected to the case are allegedly on an administrative leave of absense do to their misconduct in connection with this case.


See the Press release in as shown on the DOJ website. I am sure it makes them proud!
------------------------------------------------------------------

Contact: Jim Cross
PHONE: 316-269-6481
FAX: 316-269-6420


April 21, 2008

TWO MEN PLEAD GUILTY TO CONSPIRACY, ADMIT SELLING STOLEN GOODS TO A SHOP IN LAWRENCE, KAN.


KANSAS CITY, KAN. – Two men pleaded guilty Monday to charges of conspiracy to commit wire fraud and money laundering.

Lewis B. Parsons, II, 65, Ottawa, Kan., and James P. Ludwig, 66, Lawrence, Kan., both pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud and money laundering. Ludwig also pleaded guilty to one count of Social Security benefit fraud.

In their pleas, both men admitted stealing various items including tools from retail establishments and selling them to Yellow House Quality Appliance in Lawrence, Kan. Both men said they conspired with Yellow House owner Carrie Neighbors to sell the stolen property and to conceal the conspiracy. And both men said they were paid by checks written on an account maintained by Yellow House and Carrie and Guy Neighbors.

Ludwig stated Yellow House paid him approximately $102,000 in 2004 and 2005 for stolen property, which represented about 50 percent of the retail value of the stolen merchandise. Parsons stated Yellow House paid him approximately $30,900 in 2004 and 2005 for stolen property, which represented about 50 percent of the retail value of the merchandise.

Ludwig also admitted that he did not report the money Yellow House paid him to the Social Security Administration. As a result he received approximately $25,962 in Social Security benefits for the years 2004 and 2005 to which he was not entitled.

Ludwig is set for sentencing Dec. 15, 2008. Parsons is scheduled for sentencing Oct. 20, 2008. The maximum penalty for each count is 5 years in federal prison and a fine up to $250,000.

Guy and Carrie Neighbors are awaiting trial on charges of conspiracy, wire fraud and money laundering. In a separate case, they also face drug charges.

Melgren commended the Lawrence, Kan., Police Department, the U.S. Postal Service, the Internal Revenue Service and Assistant U.S. Attorney Marietta Parker for their work on the case.

Department of Justice launches Smear campaign against Yellow House using the Media

Why would the Kansas Department of justice release a press release full of propaganda about the Yellow House case to the media on April 22, 2008, but not display that very press release on their own press release site at the same time the information was provided to the media?


http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/ks/press.html

Why would the Lawrence Journal World delete A very critical part of the press release sent to them by the Kansas Department Of Justice? Is this selective press? Or conspiracy to defame ones character? Y Why did they leave out one whole paragraph?

http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2008/apr/22/2_plead_guilty_selling_stolen_goods/

Did Topeka Capitol Journal print the entire press release? They did include the paragraph with the unusually long extended sentencing dates of the two men that pleaded guilty in the case. The paragraph that was left out of the Journal World's article. And the question remains why would the Justice Dept. Wait so long to sentence two people that plead guilty?

http://cjonline.com/stories/042208/bre_plea.shtml#mdw-comments

DIRTY PROSECUTOR TRICK OF DELAYING SENTENCING IN ORDER TO KEEP CORRUPT YELLOW HOUSE CASE ALIVE

ANOTHER DIRTY PROSECUTOR TRICK!




James Ludwig is set for sentencing Dec. 15.
Lewis Parsons is scheduled for sentencing Oct. 20, 2008.
The maximum penalty for each count is five years in federal prison and a fine up to $250,000.

Anybody wonder why these two have sentence dates so far out in the future?
answer:
Because the corrupt prosecutors are trying to drag it out because they have nobody to testify against the yellow house in the Sept trial?
It appears that the prosecutor is expecting these two men to further perjure themselves and continue the lies at the Sept. Trial for the Yellow house.

How sad is that?

It clearly is apparent that sentencing is being delayed to make sure they do not have the option of deciding to tell the truth that the Yellow House never conspired with them and was never involved in anything outside of the law,(even though the evidence clearly shows that to be the case) because their plea is dependant upon them lying in court again at the Yellow House September trial.

The Prosecutor knows once these two are sentenced they will have no interest in carrying on this crazy charade forcing them to continue to lie in order to fulfill their end of the agreement for the plea deal.
Could it be the prosecutor hopes to keep these two guys on ice and drag out the sentencing in hopes of using these two scared old mens ridiculous false perjured testimony, apparently that is what the corrupt prosecutor offered as the plea deal! (what a joke!)

Or perhaps the Government is so busy they just have no time to get them before the Judge!
But they do seem to find time for frivolous cases!
At least the Department of Justice in Kansas has priorities!
---------------------

IN CONCLUSION:
The saddest part of this is that if the prosecutor Marietta Parker forces these two people to testify and she knows that the testimony is false, (because that was already proven in the pre-indictment hearing in front of Judge Lungstrum) then Parsons and Ludwig could both be slapped with Federal Perjury charges and have 5 more years added to their sentences!Then if they get 5 years for the perjured testimony they already gave before the Grand Jury, then this prosecutor is setting them up for an additional 10yrs added to their sentence! That is not Justice!

WARNING LETTER TO PRESS ABOUT RELEASING FALSE INFORMATION ABOUT YELLOW HOUSE BECAUSE OF JAMES LUDWIG & LEWIS PARSONS GUILTY PLEA IN FEDERAL COURT

Letter sent out to the press, in response to the guilty pleas of James Ludwig and Lewis Parsons in connection to the Yellow House Case.

April 21, 2008

I am aware that James Ludwig and Lewis Parsons both pleaded guilty in Federal Court today.
I am writing to you today to warn you that if you plan to do a story about this case you should proceed with caution. And keep in mind we will hold anyone releasing false or inaccurate information about our business accountable.

The Kansas Department of Justice and Lawrence Kansas Police department has continuously released false, slanderous and misleading information in regards to this case. And continues to do so in an effort to conceal the conspiracy and cover-up associated with the misconduct of the police and prosecutors involved in this case.

These two elderly men both presented themselves to the Yellow House business owners as legitimate business men selling legitimately acquired merchandise.
All transaction that were done with these two individuals was done at the front counter in full view of all the other patrons of the store.

All the merchandise purchased from these two individuals was recorded by checks written to them by the business owners and the merchandise was often kept out in full view.
There was never a conspiracy, discussion or any participation of any kind between these individuals and the business owners in regards to any stolen property EVER!
The Yellow House was by no means the only business these two individuals patronized. Why has no one else been named as a conspirator with these two individuals?

There is not a shred of evidence in existence that would ever prove otherwise, and any statements made that would indicate any involvement of the Yellow House with these two individuals crimes would be accusatory and unjust.

It was brought to our attention during an evidence hearing that James Ludwig presented erroneous ridiculous perjured testimony before the Grand Jury in regards to the Yellow House case. He falsely claimed that the busy Yellow House business owners openly had green hairy balls in open view of the front counter, Mr. Neighbors sold drugs to high school students and even falsely accused the Neighbors children of being involved with drugs!! All in an effort to get himself a better deal from the prosecutor.

Respectfully
Carrie & Guy Neighbors
Yellow House Store
1904 Massachusetts
Lawrence Kansas
785-842-2785

LINK TO LATEST PRESS RELEASE BY KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE TO MEDIA:

http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2008/apr/22/2_plead_guilty_selling_stolen_goods/#comments

WHEN DEFENSE ATTORNEY'S CONSPIRE WITH DIRTY CORRUPT PROSECUTORS TO FIX CASES IN FEDERAL COURT

Get free hit counter code here.

In the matter of Federal criminal cases in the Kansas Department of Justice we have uncovered that the entire process is fixed when it comes to poor and average people and small business.

Public Defender Lawyers hired by the court to defend clients are often paid HUGE amounts of money, not to defend or investigate, but instead to stall, mislead, then force the client into a plea agreement or ridiculous proffer, or become nothing more than informants for the prosecutor.

It is true if you have millions of dollars to hire well connected and skilled attorneys, you can get away with murder.

If you do not then your lawyers in most cases, will force you to plead guilty to a crime you did not commit, cancel and stall on court dates, file motions that are obviously suited to the prosecutors needs, lie to the defendants, make promises for investigative services but never follow through, even though the courts allocated thousands of dollars for the service, refuse to look into the constitutional violations that the Government committed in the case, or allow the defendant to be railroaded through the system, framed by a vindictive prosecutor then possibly even convicted in a fixed trial by prosecutors who will do any thing including breaking the laws and obstructing justice, staging A fake FBI investigation, bribing and threatening witnesses in order to obtain that conviction and get the defendants valuable seized property and forfeitures.

As your attorney is a little more than a warm body pretending to be your defense attorney. Refusing to file your requested motions in a timely manner, brushing off obvious constitutional violations that could get the case dismissed!
Like:
missing evidence,
planted evidence,
breach of contracts,
vindictive prosecution,
perjury,
false arrest

Even corrupt FEDERAL prosecutors in the Kansas Department of Justice will continue to prosecute a Federal case with the knowledge that there are Lawrence Kansas Police officers in the case on admisitrative leave, that have planted evidence, violated evidence rule law, and framed the defendants using falsified reports and convicted felons as witnesses, impersonated FBI agents and even stolen defendants guns and evidence and then fenced it to the local Pawn shops. Even going as far as violating the attorney client privaledge ethics rule by offering favors and conspiring with the defendants attorneys to undermine every motion and move by the defendants!!!!

Defense Lawyers, public and private, in most cases are only straw men for the prosecution, providing no protection or only sham defenses.

The prosecution commits, and suborns perjury from witneses and law enforcement, judges often fail to check this evil, administer the correct rectification when it becomes evident, or in some cases may willfully aid in the fixing of these cases!

CORRUPT U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE SWITCH-A-ROO OF INVESTIGATORS ON RETALIATION FEDERAL CHARGES BASED ON FRAUDULENT FBI INVESTIGATIONS

Two weeks prior to the Sept 13th, 2007 Federal Money Laundering Indictment, the defendants Guy and Carrie Neighbors filed a complaint with Internal Affairs that during the summer of 2006 Lawrence Police officers had posed as FBI agents and the Prosecutor had sent down a fake FBI agent to stage a Fake FBI investigation.

In retaliation for the complaint the Prosecutor filed the 19 count Federal Indictment against the defendants.

Prior to filing the complaints the defendants had met with both of the regions FBI agencies.
The FBI agency in Kansas City was very uncooperative. They kept telling the defendants to call back every 15-30 minutes "because the person who runs the records was busy, on a phone conference, out to lunch, etc. (And that persons name along with the person answering the phone was a secret) They claimed to have never investigated the Yellow House complaints, they claimed that there was no Special Agent Bob Shaefer, they would not tell the defendants who the person in charge was, they claimed that Lawrence Kansas was out of their Jurisdiction and they would not.. nor ever have investigated anything in Lawrence. The Kansas City FBI agency referred the defendants to the Topeka FBI agency, telling them that was the only FBI agency that had Jurisdiction over Lawrence.

The defendants then contacted the FBI in Topeka. They talked to Special Agent Scott Gentine. He was very professional open and seemed straight up and honest. He was willing to discuss the concerns of the defendants and had no problem showing the defendants his Identification card (so they could be sure he was a real FBI!).

The Agent confirmed there had never been an investigation by the Topeka FBI into the formal complaints turned in by the defendants! The defendants asked him if he would be willing to meet with them and review the complaints and documents, and also look into the fact evidence in the case was missing from the LKPD evidence room in connection with the case, and also investigate the fact an aquaintance's gun that was missing from the evidence room was for sale at the 23rd Street Pawn Shop. He agreed.

So you see after meeting with both FBI agencies the defendants filed their Formal complaint....

What happens next... is several days later the defendants are contacted by the media asking for a statement on the latest indictment. "What indictment?" ...That night on the 6pm news the 19 count indictment was announced again.."What indictment?" Even the defendants attorney's knew nothing of the Indictment!

So the next day the defendants contacted a member from the media and asked if they had a copy of the indictment. They said they did and they would give the defendants a copy if they would agree to give a statement and interview for the radio KLWN talk show. The defendants agreed.
Here is a copy of the Indictment that the media provided to the defendants. This was released prior to the defendants even being notified of the Indictment.

This original release states that the Postal Service, IRS, and LKPD investigated and Marietta Parker is prosecuting.


The next day at 4pm the Defendants were served by IRS Agent Rob Jackson and Postal Inspector David Nitz. The Press release that then appeared on the Kansas U.S. Department of Justice was changed!
Now it makes the FALSE statement that the FBI investigated! Would this be called an investigation switch-a-roo? Is this Justice Department so corrupt they don't even know who investigated their own cases?
But wait...it gets better....Upon showing up at the Kansas City Department of Justice for arrainment, the Defendants were sitting in the cafeteria when they are approached by a U.S. Marshall. The Marshall explains that he had some papers for the defendants to sign. "SAY WHAT???" ...He stated that the first indictment serving was not official..."WHAT??"..."mmmm one might even wonder which time!"

He then handed the defendants another copy of the Indictment and stated "he was not really sure what was going on either!" "But NOW its official!"...The only comment the dumbfounded defendants could make is "You guys sure waist a lot of paper!" The Marshall agreed.

see link:
http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/ks/press/Sept07/09_12.html

CONSPIRACY BY POLICE & PROSECUTORS TO USE DRUG DEALING, THIEF AS "SI" INFORMANT IN YELLOW HOUSE CASE LAWRENCE KANSAS

Between 2005 and 2006 The Yellow House business owners applied for a Car Dealership license with the Kansas Dept. Of Revenue. They also registered with EBay as a car dealership and were assigned a special representative and given the EBay Trust and Safety seal to put on car ads. During this same time the Yellow House owners were approached by Tony Reyes. He offered to help the owners find cars through auctions, fix them up and prepare them for resale in exchange for a percentage of the profits. The agreement was made and apprx. 5 cars were purchased using the Yellow House money. Tony also ran up thousands of dollars in credit accounts buying car parts at the Advance Auto store, junk yards, and the local Cottins Hardware store.

During the proffer in Aug. 2006 it was revealed by Carrie Neighbors to the police that Tony had ripped off the business for thousands of dollars and purchased at least 5 cars, hid them and then told the business owners that the police had confiscated and impounded the cars. The police officers then approached Tony and conspired with him to become an "SI" inside the business.
This in turn would help Tony cover up for the thousands of dollars he had stolen from the business owners and also help the CORRUPT police and Prosecutors put the business owners away in prison and seize their business and home.
(what amazes me is that the corrupt officials were even able to use this hearsay crap in a Federal court without any physical evidence to back any of it up!)

THE CONSPIRACY BETWEEN TONY, POLICE & DIRTY PROSECUTORS:

Tony CONSPIRED to be the inside "SI" for the cops; and proceeded to continuously hang out at the business.
He in turn made ridiculous reports about the company truck smelling like burnt marijuana, and employees having conversations with the bosses of the business about cash crops and plants. He also accused a long time friend, (a guy Tony's own dad has known for 30 years) of being the quote "RING LEADER!"
He even approached the business owners several times and attempted to get them to buy drugs from him. Tony made several reports to the police about the customers that shopped and sold items to the Yellow House as being suspicious. Not only were these hearsay reports fabricated and ridiculous, by this pathological liar drug dealing embezzeler, they were actually read before a Federal Judge in a Federal court proceeding and also used to get a Federal Indictment against the business owners.

Tony has now moved on and is continuing his fraudulent actions. He has been reportedly working "under the table" doing side work at the A-plus Auto, and buying auto parts using a fake unregistered business name of "Reyes Auto" and charge account and even has the nerve to use the Yellow House business address as his fake business address for sending bills to! (See document)!

CORRUPT ACTIONS OF THE GOVERNMENT IN YELLOW HOUSE CASE CAN ERODE PUBLIC TRUST IN LAW ENFORCEMENT

The actions of the Corrupt Prosecutors, Attorney's, Police officers, and Federal Agents, attempting to cover-up for each other in the Yellow House Case have the potential to greatly erode public trust in law enforcement and the Government of Kansas.

Our fight could not have been fought had it not been for the honest officers, Prosecutors, Agents & attorney's who honor their duty to "protect and serve." These individuals have worked hard to maintain the level of respect and integrity that their difficult jobs command.

Eventually there will be vindication for this corrupt conspiracy that has been allowed to continue for too long!

The officials who dare to stand up and protect peoples Constitutional rights, the ones who refuse to stand by while innocent people are railroaded by the Federal Government and Local police! They will be the ones who restore honor and dignity!

These are the officials who ultimately can and will restore the faith of the public (and the defendants in this case) by honoring their Oath of their duty to "protect and serve."
********************************
HERE IS TO THE CORRUPT OFFICIALS!



********************************

ARRESTS & LIS PENDENS ARE DOUBLE JEAPARDY FIFTH AMENDMENT VIOLATIONS OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS 10TH CIRCUIT COURT KANSAS YELLOW HOUSE CASE

(page 1 and 2 of the Illegal lis pendens placed on the property at 1904 Massachusetts without notification by the U.S. Department of Justice prosecutor Marietta Parker. But signed by Annette Gurney)

1. The Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution and § 10 of the Kansas Constitution Bill of Rights protect against
(1) a second prosecution for the same offense after acquittal,
(2) a second prosecution for the same offense after conviction, and
(3) multiple punishments for the same offense.

This syllabus is going to focus on the #3. Multiple punishments for the same offense. Thus violating The Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution and § 10 of the Kansas Constitution Bill of Rights.
Guy and Carrie Neighbors hearafter referred to as defendants.

1.Because there have been no guilty pleas, or convictions as required by the 10th circuit court for lis pendens or forfeitures, the actions of the Government have placed "punishment" upon the defendants in connection with the forfeiture and lis pendens actions.
2. Along with the fact the Government has arrested, starved and illegally searched the defendants twice as a form of punishment for the same exact charges and incidents.

(a) The only defense the Government offered during an evidence hearing for the cruel and unusual punishment is that quote U.S. assistant prosecuting attorney Terra Morehead stated "The Government treats all defendants in this same way"

As required by Kansas laws, the defendants have contested the lis pendens civil forfeiture action, and have brought forth attention to the courts before a Federal Judge during an evidence hearing, in regards to the cruel treatment bestowed upon the defendants during both arrests.

According to Kansas law, a forfeiture proceeding under K.S.A. 65-4171 is civil in nature, and the statutory scheme is not so punitive as to negate legislative intention to establish a civil remedial mechanism. However the Government in this case, against Kansas statutes, has used the forfeiture proceeding as a form of punishment. The Government has also used the arrests as an opportunity to place cruel and unusual punishment upon the defendants.

The lis pendins placed against the defendant’s property, absent of the required notification of the lis pendens within 60 days of the filing and in violation of the "10th circuit court statutes" has placed a heavy burden upon the defendants, has interfered with the sale of the property, and has created a tremendous financial burden upon the defendants.

The government’s response to the defendant’s motion to remove the lis pendens was to file a superseding indictment including another forfeiture allegation against the same property; just two days after the defendants filed the motion to release the lis pendens. Creating more prejudice and punishments upon the defendants.

The actions by the Government in this case have amounted to a penalty associated to a pending case without a plea or conviction in place.

There is a question of law, where the court's review is unlimited see where this court's review is unlimited. See Memorial Hospital Ass'n, Inc. v. Knutson, 239 Kan. 663, 668, 722 P.2d 1093 (1986).
The Neighbors have been subjected to "multiple punishments" for the same alleged offense in this case. See State v. Cady, 254 Kan. 393, 396, 867 P.2d 270 (1994) (citing Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161, 165, 53 L. Ed. 2d 187, 97 S. Ct. 2221 [1977]).
The United States Supreme Court consolidated two United States Court of Appeals cases from the Ninth and Sixth Circuits.
Both circuits held that the Double Jeopardy Clause prohibited the government from both punishing the defendant for a criminal offense and forfeiting defendant's property for the same offense in a separate civil action. (As is what has taken place here in this case)

IN CONCLUSION:
When a forfeiture proceeding against property is proceeded against before a person is held guilty and condemned, and therefore causes hardship, "punishment" and prejudice against that person, then it does constitute a civil action against that person as a 'punishment."
The Fifth Amendment clearly states that forfeiture cannot be used as punishment for the criminal offense.282 U.S. at 581.
When the Government places actions against the defendants of cruel and unusual punishment during an arrest, then clearly the defendant has been pre-punished for a pending crime, and therefore any punishments placed upon the defendants in the future for the same alleged crime would constitute "Double Jeapardy" and a violation of the Fifth Amendment rights of the defendant.

RACIALLY PROFILED WITNESSES INTIMIDATED BY CORRUPT CONSPIRING GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS IN YELLOW HOUSE CASE

A CONSPIRACY OF LKPD POLICE officers Mickey Rantz and John Jay Bialek jr. AND Federal U.S. Justice Department PROSECUTOR Marietta Parker TO BRIBE, INTIMIDATE and THREATEN Racially profiled minority WITNESSES!



Some of the racially profiled witnesses in the Yellow House case were originally forcefully taken against their will to the police sub-station at 15th and Wakarusa in Lawrence Kansas to be interrogated about the items they may have sold the Yellow House store.

Even though there were no police reports in existence or arrests linking these people to stolen property and the Yellow House business. And not one victim or shred of evidence of any property crimes associated with the Yellow House store..
The only evidence of a crime was the fact these profiled individuals had been written a check when selling an item to the Yellow House business.

Using the canceled checks from the Yellow House second hand stores records the police acquired names then with racial profiling and background checks police chose who they would go after to use as witnesses in the case.

Police confronted these witnesses plucking them from their homes and even confronting them at their jobs in front of co-workers and boses, intimidating them, threatening them and insisting that the items they sold the Yellow House store must be stolen!

They repeatedly attempted to intimidate and threaten the witness into admitting that they had sold something stolen to the Yellow House.
The witnesses who did not need some kind of get out of jail free deal or favor, denied any participation in criminal activity, and repeatedly denied any crime had been committed. Yet still they have had their names put on the indictment as a witness and still continue to be harassed and subpoenaed by this corrupt Kansas Government!

What happens when the police refused to accept a statement that they do not want to hear?

These same witnesses were then once again picked up and this time forced to go to the Department of Justice in Kansas City. Again they were placed in a room and forcefully interrogated about what they may have sold to the Yellow House. They were once again threatened and intimidated.
They were accused and threatened with jail time for perjury charges for making true statements that no crime had been committed and no stolen property had been sold to the Yellow House.

Then they were offered bribes by officials of $80.00 to change their story and admit that they were selling stolen property to the Yellow House Store.

When does this kind of Government conduct become unacceptable?
When the Government continues to racially profile and discriminate against the most vulnerable people in our society going after the same people over and over until they break and finally tell them what they want to hear?
If a witness makes a statement and then has to change the statement because they are threatened with perjury for making that statement or offered $80 to change the statement when does this statement become a waist of every body’s time?
When is enough enough?
If nothing else this should make for a very amusing trial! (Smile)