The prosecutor's duty is "'to seek justice, not merely to convict and seize property.'"
A prosecutor is vested with a duty not merely to convict and take away the real property of the defendants for her own personal gain, but to see that the accused receives a fair and impartial trial!!!
The Federal prosecutor (AUSA) Assistant U.S. Attorney Terra Morehead in this case is taking the actions of the defendants personal.. crying in court and attempting to gain pity from the judge and defendants defense attorneys....
Then if the prosecutor is attempting to conspire with the defense attorneys Phil and Dionne to convince them to "misinform or lie" to their clients about the speedy trial in connection with motions to combine & continue, and tricking the clients into filing motions "for the prosecutor" to combine all cases, a move that would be detrimental to the integrity of the defense of each individual defendant.... And stop the speedy trial clock...again.
When in truth the defense attorneys and their investigators should be focused on filing motions to have the case dismissed because of the Governments violations, actions and misconduct.
Then the prosecutor has clearly obstructed the right of due process afforded to the defendants Guy and Carrie Neighbors.
Quote from Prosecuting Attorney Terra Morehead to the Judge during the latest status hearing..after going over her already busy schedule..
"Your honor there are four cases here between the two defendants, these defendants will next be wanting four separate trials for each separate case causing this entire case to be on the verge of the ridiculous!"
Although in the beginning the prosecution was the one that filed the cases in individual separate charges and insisted that the defendants have separate defense attorney's.
This is starting to look more like a ploy by the prosecutor from the beginning to run the defendants out of money and force them to take the plea!
The prosecutor Marietta Parker in this case has also threatened to withhold the files and names of witnesses from the defense on the basis that witnesses names and statements have been used in the defendant’s blogs.
The REAL problem here is that there are no real witnesses. Only fabricated stories, statements and evidence.. planted, forged and missing!
The so called witnesses listed in the Indictment by initials are nothing more than names gathered by the prosecution from the checks the defendants wrote to customers selling items to the store. Or people who were given a "get out of jail free card" for committing perjury before a Grand Jury.
One so called witness was banned from the business at least 7 months prior to the first search warrant being issued in 2005. Another so-called witness called to testify before the Grand Jury was actually a defendant in a prior case that involved the testimony of the defendants.
The Law and therefore the court, relies heavily upon the integrity, objectivity and independence of the prosecutor. The prosecutor must disclose her case against the defendant, with the evidence upon which she relies. She must disclose to the defendant any non-evidential material that weakens the prosecutor’s case or assists the defendant’s case.
Because an independent, impartial prosecutor is central to due process. It is well established, for example, that a prosecutor should not prosecute when the evidence does not support the State's charges. Further, the prosecutor should have the ability to amend the charges to conform to the proofs.
The prosecutor should not proceed with a case as a favor for someone she owes, or because she hates black & white couples, or because the defendants own property that she wants to gain through wrongful convictions!
If the prosecutor does not understand this and does not make the right decisions, then she clearly risks a miscarriage of justice and the innocent defendants in this case could be convicted and loose everything they own.
Just as the video below shows!
No comments:
Post a Comment