This latest superseding indictment is an obvious attempt by the prosecutor for more cover-ups.
What is most sad is what kind of injustice the witnesses only listed by initials on the Yellow House indictment the Government claims are known to the Grand Jury have had to endure since 2005.
How much intimidation and harassment has been forced upon them to bring them to the point we are at now?
These people who as the indictment indicates are known to the Grand Jury should in reality be listed as victims of the Government.
These individuals who the Government are using as pawns in this case have been harassed at their workplace, intimidated, searched, followed, pulled over without being ticketed, illegally taken into custody to be interrogated about the Yellow House, lied to, had their families thrown to the floor and concussion grenades thrown into their homes by Lawrence Police officers, scared to death then been given plea deals and even released from prison early in exchange for their perjured non credible testimony.
Several customers victimized during the investigation of this business have filed formal complaints, and one customer is in the litigation process of a huge lawsuit against the city of Lawrence Kansas and its Police department for the harassment that was endured because of this corrupt investigation.
The question is where is the evidence of a crime?
Where are the police reports?
Where is the evidence that the owners of the Yellow House business ever participated in any property crimes, thefts, or fencing schemes when hearsay evidence is not admissible in federal court?
Why has not one thief or booster been arrested in connection with the Yellow House business or the investigation that has spanned over nearly three years?
How can the Government continue to put lis pendens and Forfeitures against the defendants property when there are no convictions?
Because someone scared out their wits that has been harassed and intimidated by the police and Government officials over a period of nearly three years are known to the Grand Jury to have sold something to the business because the Government saw their name on a check the business wrote them, does not constitute a Federal crime or a money laundering scheme.
This new superseding indictment, which is now the fourth indictment based upon one original indictment from 2005 with no new incidents of wrong doing is a disgrace to the Justice System.
The indictment calls for a forfeiture of property listed as a substitute asset. This is clearly not admissible in the 10th circuit court. There are no fruits of any crime here because there is no crime that has been proven to have been committed; only hearsay evidence has been presented by people with questionable credibility, and there have been no convictions in this case.
It makes no sense that the Government would charge defendants with no criminal history of being unlawful users with a firearm, and then dismiss the charges.
Then bring back the same charges with added enhancements execute a second arrest without new incidents on the same charges.
Then file yet another indictment of money laundering and mail fraud based on circumstantial evidence, false written statements and perjury. Then 5 months later, file a vindictive superseding indictment on top of the original questionable indictment two days after the defendants file a motion to dismiss an illegal forfeiture allegation on their property.
How many times between 2005 and 2008 can a couple of pissed off Federal prosecutors charge and arrest the same defendants on the same charges in a corrupt vindictive prosecution?
Is this case really being prosecuted by impartial prosecutors?
No comments:
Post a Comment