Prosecutor Marietta Parker Edits Blogspot post in cover-up conspiracy, obstruction of justice

Prosecutor Marietta Parker uses password obtained through warrant to edit and delete posts from defendant Guy Neighbors blog site!
To understand why and what has happened here in the present we must first go back to the past.

During an evidence hearing November 5, 2007 before the Honorable Judge Lungstrum; U.S. Attorney Terra Morehead explains to the Judge that the reason the defendants Guy and Carrie Neighbors were denied their legal right to a speedy trial was because there was a tornado in Greensburg Kansas.....

Later while talking to some long time friends the Neighbors mentioned they did not understand why the tornado in Greensburg Kansas would be the reason the Prosecutor told the Judge they were denied the speedy trial.
The Neighbors were informed by this friend that Terra was from Greensburg and that they had gone to school with Terra Morehead. They also knew Terra's family and informed the Neighbors that they believed Terra and her brother had a history of drug abuse and that from what they knew the family had been torn apart by drugs. They questioned how someone with a drug history had become a Federal Prosecutor.

Mr. Neighbors then posted a story with this acquired information on his blog site. He felt the information could be connected to the discriminatory abusive treatment he and his wife had received, while being prosecuted in Federal court by Terra Morehead. He also believed this history of drug abuse in Ms. Moreheads family combined by her hatred towards people of color, could be what is driving the prosecutor to abuse his civil rights and show obvious signs that she and her partner US Assistant Attorney Marietta Parker are taking the case personal.

This posting greatly upset the Prosecutors.
In response to the posting, Prosecuting Attorney Terra Morehead immediately motioned to have the defendants Gagged. During the hearing the Prosecutor Terra Morehead had an emotional breakdown, she cried and pleaded with Judge to gag the defendants, and make them stop blogging. She stated that a photo taken from the “Scruffy the dog case internet story” had been placed on the defendants blog site, and that she had received threats because this photo which was already publicly displayed on the internet had been posted on the blog site. She told the Judge that because of the blogs her cases were being investigated 5 years back by an outside agency!

The day of the hearing for the gag order, Mr. Neighbors is informed through an anonomous email through the blog account, that a co-worker of Marietta Parker overheard her in her office preparing for the hearing; slamming things and yelling the "N" word! Mr. Neighbors again angered the prosecutor by posting this aquired information on his blog site.

Sometime around May 2008 Prosecuting US Federal Attorney Marietta Parker serves a warrant on Sunflower cable to obtain the password information connected to the defendants Internet activities. She then logs into the defendants blog account and proceeds to go to the edit tools and deletes the story Mr. Neighbors had written about Terra Moreheads past drug history. There is also evidence through her actions that she was also logging into the email accounts and possibly reading attorney client correspondence emails.

To cover up for the fact she has illegally edited Mr. Neighbors blog account, Federal Prosecutor Marietta Parker then files a motion to revoke the bonds of the defendants Mr. Neighbors and his wife based on the blogs.

To support her motion to revoke the bond she uses pages from the blogs as exhibits. These exhibits clearly show when she copied and printed them off, she was not only logged into Mr. Neighbors blog account, she had also used the editing tools before printing off the pages. (The editing tools can still be seen in the exhibits. See photo at top of page)

What possible probable cause would give a Federal Prosecuting attorney the right to serve a search warrant on a defendants Internet provider in order to obtain passwords to everything in relation to that defendants Internet IP address?

Thus allowing this prosecutor to tamper with "the evidence" which is in this case constitutionally protected freedom of speech postings on a private blog site and view private emails that contain attorney client correspondence? How many constitutionally protected rights can a defendant have violated while being corruptly prosecuted?

IN CONCLUSION;
What justifiable legal basis or probable cause reason could a prosecutor possibly have; to get a warrant for passwords that enables her to be editing and eavesdropping on a defendants emails and blogging pages in relation to trumped up Federal charges based the execution of an illegal warrantless search of the defendants home and a bogus stolen property, money laundering case that hinges on the perjured testimony of convicted felons?

The actions of these prosecutors clearly show cover-up, conspiracy, tampering with the evidence, obstruction of justice, misuse of private information obtained through a search warrant, violation of privacy and a violation of Attorney rules of ethics.

IRS Investigations Special Agent Rob Jackson shows Pattern of Conspiracy and ethics violations with Federal Prosecutor MARIETTA PARKER

The hardest thing to understand about a case like the Yellow House case, is how can a business that has always paid its taxes, Used A professional accounting firm to audit and maintain the business finances for more than 20 years, kept up on the necessary licenses, permits, maintained good records and followed the required Federal and State requirments, filings and guidlines for employees be charged with "Money Laundering?"
Carrie Neighbors asked IRS Agent Robert Jackson to please explain during a proffer session in Aug. 2006 how she could be charged with "money laundering" when there was no hidden money and no tax evasion.

IRS AGENT ROB JACKSONS DEFINTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING:

IRS Agent Rob Jacksons definition of money laundering was that if a second hand business buys merchandise (that might be stolen) from an individual with the business check, then sells that merchandise on ebay, then the buyer pays with paypal and then from paypal the money is deposited into the business owners bank account, then all the money in the bank account becomes dirty money and anything else the business owner buys or makes payments on is purchased with dirty money and that is the "Money laundering" that the Yellow House was being charged with.

It would appear this is more of a conspiracy by the Federal IRS Investigations Department to team up IRS Agents with greedy dirty prosecutors needing favors to go after business owners that own forfeitable property, and assets using outragous "Money Laundering" charges which under Federal Law entitles the Government to Seize the defendants property and assets! This is the ridiculous charge that through the assistance of IRS Agent ROB Jackson U.S. Attorney Marietta Parker used to place a lis pendens forfeiture allegation in anticipation of a money judgement against the defendants Guy and Carrie Neighbors business and residential properties before a conviction. This type of lis pendens has been ruled impermissible in the 10th circuit court and therefore unlawfully interfered with the sale of the defendants residential property!

IRS AGENT ROB JACKSON VIOLATES THE PRIVACY LAWS:

During a conversation between Carrie Neighbors and her attorney Aaron McKee about her inability to pay all his fees, IRS Agent Rob Jackson also casually walked up and unethically disclosed the exact dollar amount of the balance in the Commerce Bank Business account for that day held by Carrie Neighbors to her attorney Aaron McKee, then proceeded to make the statement to Mr. Mckee that Carrie had more than enough money to pay him for his services. This statement was made in total disregard for Carrie Neighbors right to Federally protected privacy afforded by the Federal Government to customers of the banking institution.

IRS AGENT ROB JACKSON SEARCHES DEFENDANTS HOME WITHOUT A WARRANT AND HEADS UP AN ARREST WITHOUT KNOWING WHAT THE DEFENDANTS CHARGES ARE:

IRS Agent Rob Jackson has continued through out the Yellow House Investigation to conspire and assist the Federal Prosecutors specifically Marietta Parker, and the Lawrence Police officers, aware the charges against the defendants were not substantiated by the numbers, were fabricated and false.
His conduct and lack of ethics has violated the defendants constitutional rights, including an unlawful search of the defendants home he executed without a search warrant, while serving an arrest warrant upon the defendants. Which at the time of the arrest, IRS Agent Rob Jackson was not even aware of what the charges were he was arresting the defendants for! None of the arresting officers could inform the defendants why they were being arrested or what the charges were.

DOES IRS AGENT ROB JACKSON HAVE A PATTERN OF ETHICS VIOLATIONS & CONSPIRACY TIED TO HIS INVESTIGATIONS AGAINST BUSINESS OWNERS?

IRS Agent Rob Jackson has violated other defendant business owners rights during other investigations. A Judge in another case, Senior U.S. District Judge Scott O. Wright has ruled IRS Agent Rob Jackson is not credible and has lied on the stand while giving testimony in court. END.
----------------------------------------------
(Here is part of an interesting article we found that was written about Rob Jackson by his former collegue Charlotte Yee.)

Strange Federal Employees I Knew - Walking the Fine Line between Prisoner and Prison Guard
Posted in January 2nd, 2008 by C. Yee in Absurd,

Accountability, American Rights, Equity & Fairness, Personal Experiences

I’m dedicating this post to a former Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) colleague named Robert Jackson. Prior to becoming infamous outside of BLS, Rob (as we all knew him) was infamous within BLS. Rob would later become infamous outside of BLS for his role in a civil case that his new Agency, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) would – gasp – lose. As the Dan Margolies of the Kansas City Star quoted one of the plaintiffs, “”This whole thing was very, very scary, this Clint Eastwood character breaking the rules. All the attorneys I’ve talked to about this said they’d never seen abuse like this. They were really shocked.”

Kansas City Star, July 28, 2005

“. . . a federal judge ordered the government to pay more than $250,000 to three taxpayers after finding that an IRS agent [Robert Jackson] had disclosed confidential information to witnesses in a criminal tax investigation.

Senior U.S. District Judge Scott O. Wright assessed statutory and punitive damages after finding that special agent Robert Jackson of the IRS’ Criminal Investigative Division in Kansas City “knowingly, willfully and intentionally” made 78 illegal disclosures of taxpayer information.

I doubt that many of the BLS employees with whom Rob worked were shocked. Rob was a loose canon, and when we found out that he was transferring to the IRS and that they were giving him a gun, everyone panicked.

Me, I have two publishable recollections of Rob. My first recollection is from a business trip to Nevada, in which we helped the state install a new database system for their program. Smack in the middle of a phone conversation, Rob suggested to the Iowa programmer that I would be acting out a hard-core calendar spread for him and the two hard-working men surrounding the cubicle.

Feminists, hold your disdain, but I did not consider this to be sexual harassment. While his comment was unwanted, it was neither severe nor pervasive. Rob was a peer who would later be catching a plane back to Kansas City — in my opinion, none too soon. Secondly, he was a peer with no authority over my work or working conditions. Once my two other colleagues and I picked our jaws up off of the ground, we proceeded to ignore Rob. (I will mention here, however, that Rob Jackson did report to the Kansas City Office, which at the time was headed by Robert Gaddie — the man who thinks that women need to be inappropriately touched in order to be sexually harassed.)

My second recollection of Rob involves some poor traveler who made the untimely mistake of asking me about my plans for dinner just as a group of peers exited the elevator into the hotel lobby. Rob announced very loudly in front of us that if I wanted to have a private liaison with “Hamid,” they would go off on their own. Even if this traveler were Middle Eastern, Rob’s comments would be xenophobic and impolite. As you might have guessed, the traveler was not Middle Eastern, but rather, a darker-skinned East Indian.

There is a third recollection of Rob, but I’m not printing it here. Needless to say, Robert Jackson was “this very, very scary . . . character breaking the rules.”

I think at this point, I’ve ascertained that Rob was a bad apple. But, that still did not deter the Department of Justice from appealing the verdict against the IRS. Instead, they took the district court’s decision to the Eight Circuit Court of Appeals, where they managed to get the court to reduce the punitive damages from nearly $176,000 to $19,589. They also managed to get the district court’s award of expert witness fees thrown out.

All of this is despite the appeals court confirmation that “Jackson’s numerous disclosures of return information, including the fact that the Taxpayers were under grand jury investigation, were unauthorized and were not made in good faith.”

Ultimately, falsely accused taxpayers Leonard Snider and Theresa J. Turley won, but they did not win. Rob Jackson spread lies about their character and business in 2001, and on November 8, 2006 while simultaneously confirming wrongdoing by Robert Jackson on behalf of the Internal Revenue Service, the court of appeals took away award money that had been granted by the district court. And that money was small in comparison with what it did to the falsely accused. One of the falsely accused taxpayers, Leonard Snider, lost his business. The other, Theresa Turley, not only lost her business, but had tried to commit suicide three times during Rob Jackson’s untruthful investigation of her. And these were entrepreneurs just trying to eke out a living and live the American dream.

(To read the entire article click on the title to get the link I pulled this story from.)
--------------------------------------------
follow-up:
C. Yee said,in May 29th, 2008 at 9:57 am I was actually excited because I had hoped that Rob Jackson was finally indicted. But, in typical federal government logic, I see he is still working and stealing our our hard-earned taxpayer dollars, while harassing taxpayers, no less.

Have you tried contacting DAN MARGOLIES of the Kansas City Star? You might remind him of several articles he wrote about Mr. Jackson, the first dated 7/28/05 and the second, 11/10/06. That Jackson has already had his credibility ripped in court makes it a public interest story. It is as if what Mr. Turley went through had no impact on the overall functioning of the Treasury. It only goes to make my case that Rob Jackson represents what the IRS wants, soldiers to do its bidding, whatever that may be. I continue to mourn for good, honest hard-working Americans everywhere.

P.S. Continue the fight. I am hoping for the dawn of a new era — an era of integrity.

CORRUPT FEDERAL INDICTMENT OF YELLOW HOUSE STORE

ERRONEOUS information provided by the Justice Department to the News media to further destroy the reputation of the defendants.

The Justice Department maliciously released a false press release claiming that the Yellow House owners were charged with 2 counts of distribution, AND that they had been committing crimes since 2002!

This erroneous press release was part of the conspiracy and was carefully calculated by the Kansas Department of Justice to cover-up the fact the indictment was actually a vindictive refiling of the same charges that had just been dismissed.