The Yellow House Business owners Constitutional right to be free from a Stalking Government and protected under the Federal Antitrust laws and Sherman Act have been continuously violated!
Within one week of the Dec 2, 2005 search warrant being served upon the Yellow House Store, the Government violated the Antitrust act rights of the business owners by falsely reporting to Ebay that the Yellow House was fencing stolen property using their Internet site.
This allegation was made even though there were no charges, no arrests and no evidence existed that the Neighbors were involved in any kind of fencing activity. Furthermore.. There were absolutely no police reports linking the Yellow House to any stolen property reports. There were no theft reports or victims of theft that had been linked to any of the property confiscated during the search.
There was not one witness, (even after police repeatedly unsuccessfully tried to bribe witnesses with $50 to set up the Yellow House business with stolen Property) that could give any testimony to lead a reasonable person to believe there was ever any conspiracy by the business owners that involved other peoples criminal activities.
THE CONSPIRACY:
The suspension from Ebay allowed other businesses like the Pawn Shops to gain a competitive edge over the Yellow House. The Confiscation of the business records revealed from the beginning to the Government that 75% of the Yellow House business was conducted through on-line sales.
Part of the conspiracy against the business was to run them out of business by interfering with their trade abilities. An alleged conspiracy between the Police and the Pawn Shops that would allow the Pawn Shops (Whom have the buddy system from the local police) and run their own ebay sites, to monopolize the market in Lawrence. The Sherman Act provides: "Every person who shall monopolize, or attempt to monopolize, or combine or conspire with any other person or persons, to monopolize any part of the trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations, shall be deemed guilty of a felony.
After the suspension without a justifiable cause, various family members and friends came forward one at a time to help; and allowed the Yellow House business owners to sell merchandise using their Ebay accounts. Each time the Neighbors used someones ebay account to sell merchandise, the Government would have that persons Ebay account was also suspended, absent of any charges or evidence a crime had been committed. Some accounts were suspended before any of the auctions were even completed. furthering the conspiracy and interfering with the Yellow House businesses right to fair market trade and competition.
Then on August 18Th, 2008, the Neighbors were released from Leavenworth Maximum security Federal detention center, following their arrest and incarceration on August 8Th, 2008 for obstruction of Justice.
The Neighbors were searched and arrested for "obstruction of Justice" by Lawrence Police officers including two officers named as witnesses Jay Bialek & Micky Rantz that were court ordered not to have contact with the defendants, the Postal Inspector David Nitz, and KU detective Mike Riner along with KU police officers, A KU police officer transported Carrie Neighbors in handcuffs to the jail, and a Lawrence Police officer & David Nitz transported Guy Neighbors to the jail.
Both Carrie and Guy Neighbors were arrested because they requested to have their attorneys be present before handing over paperwork or making statements in regards to a stolen property investigation being handled by the University Police.
As part of the conditions of their release Aug. 18Th,2008, the Neighbors were court ordered by Federal Judge James O'Hara to no longer sell over the Internet. Again more restrictions on the business absent of any proof of wrong doing by the defendants involving the use of the Internet or the banks to conduct their business. Further interfering with the Neighbors ability to run their business competitively in the free trade market.
The Sherman Act provides: "Every contract, combination in the form of trust or otherwise, or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations, is declared to be illegal.
FORMAL REQUEST FOR AN INVESTIGATION:
The Neighbors request that a full investigation be conducted into the justification of the continued conspiracy by Government officials to run them out of business, put them at an unfair disadvantage against their competitors and interfere with their ability to conduct business since December of 2005.
THE STALKING HORSE GOVERNMENT:
Ongoing illegal STALKING activity by Government officials hiding behind the protective veil of an unjustified ongoing investigation lasting 4 years, with 6 Federal indictments, Prosecutors Piling up charges absent of any new activity in the case, dismissing charges then bringing them back. only to have them dismissed again, repeated arrests for the same charges, along with a superseding indictment to cover-up an illegal lis pendens, repeated search warrants that included the undocumented seizures of expensive property, theft of the business surveillance tape, repeated strong armed arrests, surveillance without a court order, Grand Jury secrecy violations, arrests & Indictments orchestrated to obstruct justice, hinder an investigation by an outside agency into the Governments misconduct and to cover-up the conspiracy.
THE DEFENDANTS REQUEST A FULL INVESTIGATION INTO THE CORRUPT ONGOING ACTS BY GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS OF CONSPIRACY AND VIOLATIONS OF THE ANTITRUST LAWS!
The Sherman Act puts responsibility upon government attorneys and district courts to pursue and investigate trusts, companies and organizations suspected of violating the Act. Since no one is above the law, this includes Police departments and Government officials suspected of violating the act.
The Clayton Act(1914) proves the extent of the seriousness of the offense when it extended the right to sue under the antitrust laws to "any person who shall be injured in his business or property by reason of anything forbidden in the antitrust laws."
No comments:
Post a Comment